Archive for category Technology
Hello again – I’ve been absent for a while, dealing with a major life transition (same wife and kids – thank God – but new job, new location, and what feels like a new life). But enough dust has settled and boxes unpacked to make writing possible. So here we go:
I’m moving into the world of smart phones and will get my very own shiny little handheld tomorrow. I’m feeling this strange mix of giddy attraction and dread – I’ve played with one before and what they can do is dazzling and dizzying. But then there’s this sense of foreboding – what am I invoking in this smartphone? Will this phone become more than just a phone? (actually, it’s not called a phone but a device. What’s behind that language?) What place in my life do I want to give this thing?
I could be making this a bigger deal than it need be but then I should tell you about my Pac-Man problem during university. Besides, the manufacturer of this phone claims it will change everything (sort of like the ad above claiming a phone will save us). As of tomorrow, my life will never be the same again, transformed because of my phone … er, device.
And according to a growing body of research, those claims are not that far off the mark. I will be changed indeed, just not in ways I might hope. Here are a few canaries I’ve spotted lately flying out of the technology coal mine:
Professor Sheryl Turkle, in her book Alone Together, outlines the effects of technology on our intimacies. “Technology promises to let us do anything from anywhere with anyone. But it also drains us as we try to do everything everywhere. We begin to feel overwhelmed and depleted by the lives technology makes possible. We may be free to work from anywhere, but we are also prone to being lonely everywhere. In a surprising twist, relentless connection leads to a new solitude. We turn to new technology to fill the void, but as technology ramps up, our emotional lives ramp down.”
Then in a sobering “this is your brain on technology” piece, a New York Times article chronicles how our devices change the way we relate, the way we think, our capacity to respond, the very shape of our brain. A blog piece at ThinkChristian reflects on the whether our copious time before screens leads to objectification of people.
And recently I was listening to Q a while back (a fine arts and culture radio show on CBC). It spring-boarded off of an incident you might recall, where a concert at New York’s Fisher Hall was stopped by the conductor because of a smart-phone ringing. The host of Q, Jian Gomeshi, wonders about the limits of our phones and whether we need to (gasp!) turn off the ringers and alarms because they’re distracting us from art. I’d go much further and wonder if they distract us from much of living.
Gomeshi asks: “Maybe we’ve become a weaker species with the advent of mobile devices. If we can’t relinquish our connectedness for Moller, Kronenberg or even for a child’s recital, what have we become? Here’s to being brave and missing a text or two.”
How about the courage to think hard about the role and place of technology. Enter Albert Borgmann, one of the finer thinkers on technology. He notes that technology is less a neutral tool and more “an inducement, and it’s so strong that for the most part people find themselves unable to refuse it. To proclaim it to be a neutral tool flies in the face of how people behave.” I’ve seen too many gatherings of people with everyone staring at some form of screen or another to argue with him.
While technology promises to make life easier, Borgmann wonders if there are certain burdens we should not want to get rid of. It seems so contrarian, but are there things in life we should not relinquish because they are difficult or inconvenient? Perhaps the quest for convenience actually deforms us?
I’ll be honest, sometimes I’m glad to get a voice mail instead of a real person. I can quickly pass on a message or avoid a longer conversation and get on with things. But just maybe there’s a difficulty here that would be more important for me to embrace than convenience or efficiency? What if the burden of depending on someone else and asking for directions is better for me, more community building, than downloading directions? Perhaps the inconvenience of attending a worship service with average worship and preaching is more life-giving than listening to a podcast in my pajamas? Maybe the challenge of revealing too much in a face-to-face conversation through my tone, body language and presence is more enlivening than a 140 character tweet or Facebook update?
Borgmann reminds us that technological devices, like a smart phone, are not the enemy. Rather we must ask “How do we gather technological devices together into the good life? Nothing by itself makes for a better life.” That’s why I’m feeling mixed about my smart phone – it is not the enemy but it’s not a neutral thing either. How can I allow this device in to make for a better life? How can I be street-smart about my smartphone before it turns me foolish?
One of the ways to think and talk about the place and role of technology, Borgmann writes, is the need to place “reasonable bounds on their use … how we sit with technological devices in our home is morally significant.”
So here’s a few commitments I’m making as I gather this device into my life:
- If I’m meeting you for lunch or coffee, I will keep my phone off the table, generally out of sight.
- I will honour the person who is giving me the gift of their presence instead of an incoming call, text or email that might barge into that conversation or meeting.
- I will keep a weekly technological sabbath, a day of unplugged living as a practice to remind myself that I am a created, embodied being not a virtual one.
Again, hear me well Facebook fans and Apple cult members. I’m not a Luddite or calling for an Amish renewal, I’m not at all saying technology is evil, the internet is the great Satan, and my new cell number the mark of the beast. I’m simply wondering about the proper place and role of technology, and how we might guard that place and role.
How do you place reasonable bounds on technology in your life?
Instead of the usual Friday photos I’m posting a few Calvin and Hobbes cartoon strips. On a recent stop in Portland’s Powells Books, I added a few more volumes to my collection. Calvin and Hobbes is the simply the most brilliant, witty and visually beautiful comic strip published. Named after the theologian and philosopher, Calvin and Hobbes engages with hilariously astute observations on the human condition, theological/philosophical arguments in micro form, and the capacity to usher you into the wild and wonderful imagination of a child (Forget any of the parenting books on the market, Calvin and Hobbes is my choice for best authority for understanding my son, providing uncannily accurate front-line reports from inside the thinking and imagination a very precocious 6 year old).
Heading off to Regent College’s Pastor Science project, I’ve put a few strips of Calvin and Hobbes connected to science. There’s a playfulness and humour here that I’m pretty sure has to be part of both the scientific and theological project. I love the crazy conversations Calvin and his Dad have – as a scientific lay person, his Dad’s explanations work pretty well for me. My favourite line comes from Calvin in the first strip – “That’s the whole problem with science. You’ve got a bunch of empiricists trying to describe things of unimaginable wonder.”
There’s an intriguing new book out by professor Sherry Turkle called Alone Together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. She’s exploring how use of technology shapes our relationships, wondering what will be the impact of importing “the technologies of efficiency into our intimacies.” My take is that she’s not real sunny about what she’s seeing; and, well, who can blame her – the notion of “friend” has been pretty much drained of its heart by Facebook.
Canada’s Globe and Mail did an interview with her here. She’s worried that much of the social media technology produces narcissists, a soul who does not feel okay to be alone, needing constant validation, “a self so fragile that it needs constant support.” She not a neo-Luddite, arguing we drop these technologies, but more simply insisting they be put in their proper place.
I’m thinking this might be a good read alongside of my planned sabbatical reading of Albert Borgmann’s Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life (I remember Eugene Peterson recommending this book as the one book to read if you wanted a good overview of the impact of technology on human life). Here’s an interview with Borgmann that will give you a sense of his thinking.
So is Turkle on the money in her assessment? What are your thoughts on how technology/social media impact human relationships (with others and God)? What is it doing? How is it shaping us?